Australian Bank Job Cuts Put Branch Access Under Pressure

NAB is reportedly looking to shed 2500 jobs. Picture: John Gass

---

OPINION

Major banks are cutting staff while customers still rely on people to resolve tasks that digital channels can’t handle. My recent attempt to pay a builder exposed how branch hours, staffing levels and security checks can turn one transfer into a three-day ordeal.

Job reductions meet service demand

Westpac recently announced 250 job cuts ahead of Christmas, saying it would “actively manage costs and investment.” NAB has said it plans to reduce its workforce by 2,500 by mid-2027 to “simplify its operating model”. The article cites expected 2026 profits of $7.1 billion for Westpac and $9.1 billion for NAB. ANZ and CBA have also made significant cuts over the past two years; their cited figures are $7.5 billion in expected profit for ANZ and $10.9 billion in reported profit for CBA.

Those figures sharpen the question customers ask when they encounter long queues or closed doors: how can banks be reducing staff when help is already hard to reach? The strain becomes visible when customers need support with a disputed charge, an account belonging to a deceased relative or a payment that the bank won’t allow them to make online.

MORE:$5bn in homes gone as foreign buyers flood market

A payment caught between limits and branch hours

My problem was straightforward: I needed to pay a builder for work at my home. The invoice exceeded the $25,000 transaction limit available to me, and the bank said I’d have to visit a branch to make the transfer. The builder expected payment within five days.

Online listings showed two branches near my office, both open until 4.30pm. I left at 4pm and reached the first at 4.15pm, only to find staff closing the security door. I tried the second branch ten minutes later. It was shut too.

The following day, I went to a branch in my local shopping centre during lunch. Two customers were ahead of me waiting for the concierge, who said the branch was short-staffed and the wait would be 45 minutes. I had the invoice and identification with me, but couldn’t complete the payment there and then.

Westpac was the latest to announce job cuts last week. Picture: John Gass

---

MORE: Shock as coffee cups banned in Aus for good

One transaction, four visits

I returned to the city the next day and arrived at a branch by 3pm. A teller could process the transfer, but first I had to call the builder to verify the recipient’s account details as an anti-scam check. The builder didn’t answer the first two calls. On the fifth attempt, he picked up, and the payment went through.

By then, staff were drawing down the shutters, although I was still inside. I left at 4.45pm, after nearly two hours at the branch. It was my fourth visit in three days for a single payment.

MORE:Tenant skips meals after landlord’s shock demand

The security check made sense, and the teller was trying to help. The failure sat in the process around them: a payment cap that required an in-person visit, branches that closed before their listed hours, a long wait at another location and limited staff available to handle the request.

That’s the customer experience banks risk creating as they reduce headcount. Digital banking covers routine tasks, but the exceptions still need people, time and accessible branches. When a home renovation bill can’t be paid without repeated trips and a string of phone calls, staff cuts start to look less like an internal efficiency measure and more like a service constraint.

MORE:‘Dirty’ RBA detail homeowners won’t like

For customers managing property payments, timing matters: a bank transfer can be tied to a builder’s invoice, a settlement or another deadline. Banks may keep shifting routine services online, but they’ll still need enough staff and workable branch access when a transaction falls outside the standard path.